|
||||
I am a retired market strategist, technical analyst and developer of
trading systems. Kindly do not identify me and I will be happy to share my experience. Long term market analysis shows that one-third of the time a market
(regardless if the instrument is stocks, bonds, currencies or softs) will trend, one-third of the time the market will be
affected by cycles, and one-third of the time is undecipherable (what geeks call noise or perhaps the market is undergoing
a transitional phase) when the wise will not trade. The most common failing of market trading systems is that they take
a run of some data usually without much regard if the period is truly representative and attempt to fit some signals (like
oscillators) which may make some profits on their model, say for instance a 60% ratio of wins to losses and hopefully that
the net loss amounts do not exceed the net profits. When market characteristics change these systems fail. For about ten years
there have been adaptive models available. These systems continually analyze the markets and the trading signals continually
adapt to changing market conditions. This is based on the simple fact that the most recent inputs are the most valuable, not
for instance a cycle or trend that happened a long time ago. An analogy would be a missile defense system that spots a missile tracking
in a straight line for a period, and then the missile starts to turn. The most recent data is clearly the most valuable info
for predicting the intended target or for that matter the trajectory of a stock, bond, gold, currency, etc. John Ehlers developed
MESA or Maximum Entropy Spectral Analysis which has been tested as giving the best long term results as a trading model and
which is based on algorithms similar to those used in complex systems such missile defense and seismographic analysis. T he best results have been in bonds and currencies, though other instruments
do well. There is a similar system for very short term traders. A few words of advice: Moving averages define the trend and
oscillators such as stochastic, RSI, and MACD as signals work best when used with the trend. On other words if the trend is
up, sell signals based on oscillators do not work well, and buy signals work well. In a market that is affected by cycles
and the m/a's are flat both buy and sell signals work. Needless to say if after some trending and an overbought or oversold
condition has developed and if the m/a's flatten and oscillators diverge with price, look for a change in trend. The market
usually sends signals that the unwary ignore. A perfect oscillator trading signal can be defined as a half cycle. If for instance
the 18 trading day cycle (nine days up and nine days down) in stocks is the most prevalent cycle, a 9 day oscillator is perfect
for timing buys and sells. However any attempt to stay in tune with the market helps. If your
analysis is off by as much as 20% as to cycle length the trading signals will still be efficient. If this has not already
confused you, there are cycles overlaid on each other within a trend that are visible in the charts to the naked eye with
a little practice. For instance within an 18 day cycle there can be 4 to 5 day cycles that you can trade if you are shorter
term oriented, best done with the trend. Pattern recognition such as Japanese Candlesticks used in conjunction with the above
gives good results. This article appeared in Urban Survival
|
||||
There are always opportunities through which businessmen can profit handsomely if they will only recognize and seize them. J. Paul Getty (1892 - 1976)
|
||||