Make your own free website on Tripod.com

GENERAL ECONOMICS

"Jim Rogers on Russia"

Home
YOU LIVE IN A VIGOCRACY, NOT A DEMOCRACY!
PITAGORAS INTERNACIONAL SA. SITES MAP!
"Jim Rogers on Russia"
The Bullionist Controversy
PEAK PORK! IS THE UNTHINKABLE HAPPENING?
GREENSPAN, THE QUEEN, AND THE FED BLUNDERED BADLY! YET THE WATCHDOG DID NOT BARK IN THE NIGHT!
POP GOES THE REAL ESTATE WEASEL! Part 1
NOVEMBER 28, 2005, IS THE ANNIVERSARY OF THE REUTERS-CRB INDEX ALL TIME HIGH!
THE DEVOLUTION INTO A VAMPIRE ECONOMY.
THE SOCIAL SECURITY STING! ONE OF THE GREAT SCAMS!
Wilhelm Roepke's Wisdom! On modern mass culture
FIND OUT ABOUT OUR NEW SERVICE, THE TRENDTRACKER copyright 2005!
Cranks in the Gold Community
Welcome to The Battle For your Money, and Your Mind! The Perpetual War!
"Liberal" Justices Turn Back Clock ... To the Year 1215
OUR LATEST SPECIAL REPORT IS NOW AVAILABLE! ESCAPE THE RETIREMENT ACCOUNT TRAP!
America Created It's Own Money in 1750
A NEW FEDERAL AGENCY FOR A NEW ECONOMY!
THE FEDERAL RESERVE! ITS ORIGINS, HISTORY, AND CURRENT STRATEGY

"Jim Rogers on Russia"

Jim Rogers and a Harvard Business School Student Dmitry Alimov
"Jim Rogers on Russia"

Below is a humorous email exchange between Jim Rogers and a Harvard Business School Russian Student Dmitry Alimov

Also see the original post of Jim Rogers on Russia as well as comments from Russian readers (if you read Russian).

----- Original Message -----
From:
Dmitry Alimov
To:
dalimov@mba2004.hbs.edu
Sent:
Friday, September 12, 2003 11:28 PM
Subject:
Conversation with Jim Rogers - HILARIOUS

Jim Rogers, a famous international investor and writer attended HBS this Wednesday. In his speech, he badmouthed Russia (in his usual style) and quoted several "facts" that were completely bogus. As you would expect, I could not let him get away with lying about our country and publicly disputed his factual claims. He basically told me I was a moron and left. In response, I sent an email to him with facts and references disputing his claims (sending a copy to my HBS classmates). What ensued is quite amazing - read attached emails. Start with the first email and read from the end (my original email), then read his response and finally my rebuttal in the second email. This will be worth your time I promise. This has already been circulated all over HBS, several other universities and in the investment community in New York. Since this is already in public domain, feel free to forward on.

Dima
__________________________________________________

Dear Mr. Rogers: I am the “lad” who disputed your factual claims with regard to Russia today. First of all, I would like to thank you for speaking to us at the Harvard Business School.  I think I speak for my fellow HBS students when I say that we enjoyed your original views and interesting stories today. However, I must address the unfortunate reality that your facts about Russia are plain wrong. You made three principal inaccurate claims today - I will deal with all of them in sequence.

Claim #1.  People are leaving Russia

Wrong.  In fact, according to Financial Times, your favorite newspaper, Russia turns out to be the second largest recipient of immigrants after the US (see attached FT article). Oops. While it is true that Russia’s population is declining but the reasons for that have nothing to do with people leaving the country, it is things like low birth rate (only 1.2 per woman), which is an issue that confronts many European states.

Claim #2. Russia’s production of oil is declining, oil companies do not reinvest in production

Wrong and wrong.  Russian oil production has increased for the fifth year in a row (see attached Reuters article), and Russian oil majors are reinvesting in production (many of them have US GAAP accounts audited by Big Four firms you could easily have access to if you chose to look).

Claim #3. Investors are leaving Russia

Wrong again. Equity indexes (US Dollar denominated) are trading around their all time highs (see attached Barrons article), Russian bond yields are at historical lows.  As an experienced investor, surely you will recognize these as pretty convincing signs of investor confidence.

Overall state of the economy

Finally, I would like to quote World Bank’s recent report on Russia: “The Russian Federation has made remarkable progress in tackling crisis and moving towards sustainable development between 1999 and 2002. With a much more stable political environment, the government has been able to build on experience gained in the 1990s and implement a sound reform agenda, in addition to maintaining macro-economic stability. Since 1999, assisted by high commodity prices, the economy has recorded strong growth, business confidence has revived, and poverty has declined. Russia’s sovereign credit rating has improved, although it has yet to reach investment grade. The speed and extent of recovery has taken most observers by surprise. Between early 1999 and end 2001, GDP grew by 21 percent, inflation fell from 86 percent to 18 percent, the fiscal situation turned around from a deficit of 5 percent of GDP to a surplus of 3 percent of GDP, and barter and arrears largely disappeared.”            

Source: http://www.worldbank.org.ru GDP growth of 21%? Hardly a picture of total collapse, don’t you think?

Conclusion I believe the facts speak for themselves. I have no time or desire to try to convince you to invest in Russia. However, I do kindly ask you to abstain from spreading inaccurate information. You are a public figure and many people including future leaders at Harvard Business School listen to you; it would be very unfortunate if they were misled by your inaccurate statements.  Finally, if nothing else, it is not good for your own public image. 

Kind regards,

Dmitry Alimov, CFA MBA Class of 2004
Harvard | Business | School

dalimov@mba2004.hbs.edu
Ph 617.491.7332

P.S. I took the liberty of sending a copy of this email to my fellow students so that we can set the record straight. ____________________________________________________

Thank you for coming and for writing.

I rarely suffer fools gladly and even more rarely bother with chauvinistic know nothings, but since you sent this ludicrous canard:

[1] My goodness. Not only do you have no idea about what you are speaking, we now know you cannot read. The “immigration study” you mention was a bunch of estimates for the years 1970 to 1995. What the hell does that have to do with Russia in the past 8 years? Many were forced to go into Russia from the Soviet Republics under the Communists, but that was hardly free immigration as in the other countries. Even if people were going into Russia in the early 1990s, they were Russians being forced to leave the old USSR republics as the USSR dissolved in the early 1990s and those Russians fled back into Russia.

You have demonstrated you cannot read nor analyze nor have any concept of what is happening in Russia today, but do you not at least know a little Russian history?

[2] Oh my. You really should have kept your mouth shut and stopped long ago. This is not from “Reuters”. It is from the Russian government – the same group which claims to have had a balance of trade surplus for the last 9 years. The same group of bureaucrats and charlatans who became a laughing stock with their “facts” under  the USSR. The same who say that the Russian balance of trade in that period has been among the largest in the world. I did not think even B school students fell for that claptrap any more. But then you are the one who says the ruble is a good buy and that “it is a strong currency”. I suggest you check your facts on what has happened to the ruble in those 9 years when Russia “had the strongest balance of trade surplus in the world”. And that was a period when huge sums were also flowing in from the World Bank, IMF, etc, etc. “Inflows from the strongest balance of trade in the world and billions from the World Bank, etc” yet the currency kept declining. I and most others find that extremely strange.

Somehow or another the currency kept falling since most of us realized the same old bureaucrats were spewing out the same old garbage. I guess you were buying rubles all that time. No wonder you are in school rather than making it in the real world. You must have gone broke buying all those rubles.

And if Russian oil production is really up so much, why is the price of oil still so high? So you are indeed a gullible lad, but fortunately the market knows a lot more than you and your wailing into the wind.

You might read the section of my book about Russia’s reported figures – especially the trade figures. Or get some one to read it to you and explain it to you.

I know you said you have driven across Russia from the Pacific to Europe, but I’d like to know your route and which border crossings you used and who you found out there counting all this stuff.

[3] You really should have kept your mouth shut, but since you opened it: What balderdash. Now we know you have no understanding of markets in addition to being unable to read or comprehend. The Russian “market” is tiny and is insignificant compared to GNP so it is meaningless. Even your article points out that the few big hydrocarbon companies account for 70% of the stock market. [a] The price of oil more than doubled in the period the article discusses and [b] those stocks went up because of that and because of the manipulation by the oligarchs. Perhaps you did not notice your article mentioned the “murky” dealings in Russia?

I hardly consider 2 mutual funds and 4 or 5 manipulated oil stocks “as pretty convincing signs of investor confidence”.

But if you really believe all this codswallop, why are you in business school? Why aren’t you there making your fortune?

I presume you are long the Russian stock market?

For what it is worth, I was short the ruble and the Russian market in the summer of 1998 and back in the earlier bubble in the mid 1990s when Russia and its bureaucrats were going on and on with the same absurdity. Go back and look up what happened both times. Or perhaps you were long then too and got wiped out which is why you had to go to b school.

[4] “Overall state of the economy”: Now we are getting really embarrassed for you! The World Bank also praised Russia in 1998 just before the last collapse and in the mid 1990s just in time for that collapse. They also wrote in rapturous terms about all the Asia Tigers in mid 1997 just in time for the Asian Crisis [I was short Hong Kong back then too right into the World Bank’s rapture.] And the World Bank could not give Argentina enough money in the summer and fall of 2001 because of “its progress” when I was getting all my money out. [All this is very much on the public record so you do not need to fret about my image.]  

Need I go on? No one has ever stayed solvent much less made money listening to the World Bank [except business school professors who “consult” for them].

Oh dear, you get your information from the Russian government and the World Bank!? Are you mad? I know you say you have driven across Russia, but who do you really think is out there in those 11 time zones and tens of thousands on kilometers of Russia collecting all this “reliable data”?

And thanks for your advice about my analysis, facts and my “public image”. If you had done your homework, you’d know the public was and is extremely aware that I had shorted the ruble in 1998 and back in the mid 1990s [when I guess you were long]. It was the same kind if misinformation back then too that gullible souls like you swallowed.

And the public is extremely aware of my record of investing in many markets all over the world for many years. You might read John Train’s Money Masters of Our Time or one of several other books. I do not worry about it, but you should worry about yours.

But as for public image and inaccurate statements, you have demonstrated quite publicly and vocally that you can neither read nor comprehend what you read nor can you analyze anything in front of you and that you fall for anything someone tells you and that you have absolutely no knowledge of even recent Russian history. I was terribly embarrassed for you when you stood there babbling on in front of the others about the strong ruble – a currency which has been nothing but a catastrophe for a decade [despite your painfully absurd statements], but now you have shouted your hopelessness from the roof tops for all to see.

I hope your classmates will pull you aside and pass on this word of advice: It is better to remain silent and have people wonder if you are an idiot rather than to open your mouth and prove to everyone in sight that you are an idiot beyond all doubt. And one should never, ever go shouting from the rooftops when one is a total idiot because then the entire school knows it.

 

 _____________________________________________________  

Mr. Rogers:

I see that you prefer the language of personal insults instead of informed polite discussion. Well, this is your choice and I hope this is not consistent with your sense of style – you are a successful individual (as you mentioned many times) and it would be a shame to tarnish that with this sort of attitude. Also, apologies for getting you a little riled, I didn’t mean to, nor did I expect you to. I am enjoying the discussion and would like to just rebut some of your remarks.


Thank you for coming and for writing. I rarely suffer fools gladly and even more rarely bother with chauvinistic know nothings, but since you sent this ludicrous canard:

[1] [immigration] My goodness. Not only do you have no idea about what you are speaking, we now know you cannot read. The “immigration study” you mention was a bunch of estimates for the years 1970 to 1995. What the hell does that have to do with Russia in the past 8 years? Many were forced to go into Russia from the Soviet Republics under the Communists, but that was hardly free immigration as in the other countries. Even if people were going into Russia in the early 1990s, they were Russians being forced to leave the old USSR republics as the USSR dissolved in the early 1990s and those Russians fled back into Russia.
You have demonstrated you cannot read nor analyze nor have any concept of what is happening in Russia today, but do you not at least know a little Russian history?



For your viewing pleasure, below are the actual numbers of net migration (immigration less emigration) through 2001. As you can see, there is a net inflow in every single year for the past two decades. This does not even include an estimated 1-1.5 million of illegal immigrants to Russia.


Net Migration and Natural Increase in Russia, 1980–2001


(Abridged)

Source: State Committee of the Russian Federation on Statistics, Goskomstat Rossii

As you correctly point out, much of the immigration comes from the states of the former Soviet Union (although a very large part of the immigrants are Ukrainians and other CIS nationals). However, the fact remains that before and after 1995, immigration to Russia far exceeded emigration from Russia, which is the opposite of your original claim.



[2] [oil production] Oh my. You really should have kept your mouth shut and stopped long ago. This is not from “Reuters”. It is from the Russian government – the same group which claims to have had a balance of trade surplus for the last 9 years. The same group of bureaucrats and charlatans who


The quote below is taken directly from US Department of Energy website (I hope you at least believe your own government):


“A turnaround in Russian oil output began in 1999, which many analysts have attributed to rising world oil prices during this period (oil prices tripled between January 1999 and September 2000), as well as a number of after-effects of the 1998 financial crisis and subsequent devaluation of the ruble in August. Today, Russian oil fields are maintained using modern technologies from around the world, and many of the old command economy institutions have been streamlined. The rebound in Russian oil production has continued since 1999, resulting in 2002 total liquids production of 7.65 million bbl/d (7.4 million bbl/d of which was crude oil)--a 26% increase over the 1998 level. Accordingly, Russia is now the world’s second largest crude oil producer behind only Saudi Arabia.


(Abridged)

Source:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/russia.html#oil


Or do you think the US government is also lying?



became a laughing stock with their “facts” under the USSR. The same who say that the Russian balance of trade in that period has been among the largest in the world. I did not think even B school students fell for that claptrap any more.

I don’t think my fellow students deserve this condescending treatment. You should also know that my other Russian speaking HBS classmates were appalled by your comments in and after class. In addition to misstating the facts, you also characterized the country in an offensive manner. We are all rational people and are prepared to discuss the Russian economy and culture on merits (clearly, there are many negative things, particularly in the recent past) but it’s a very different matter when someone starts insulting a nation.



But then you are the one who says the ruble is a good buy and that “it is a strong currency”.

This is not quite the statement I made, but nice try at remembering. What I said was that this year, Russian currency appreciated and I stand by my statement. From 31.7 rubles/US$ at the end of 2002 it appreciated to 30.7 rubles/US$ now. I did
not say it is a strong currency and I certainly don’t think that any currency is a good investment given that currencies are not interest bearing.


I suggest you check your facts on what has happened to the ruble in those 9 years when Russia “had the strongest balance of trade surplus in the world”. And that was a period when huge sums were also flowing in from the World Bank, IMF, etc, etc. “Inflows from the strongest balance of trade in the world and billions from the World Bank, etc” yet the currency kept declining. I and most others find that extremely strange. Somehow or another the currency kept falling since most of us realized the same old bureaucrats were spewing out the same old garbage. I guess you were buying rubles all that time. No wonder you are in school rather than making it in the real world. You must have gone broke buying all those rubles.

And if Russian oil production is really up so much, why is the price of oil still so high? So you are indeed a gullible lad, but fortunately the market knows a lot more than you and your wailing into the wind.


I find it amusing that you would ask this question. Surely you know that market prices are determined by many factors including demand (which, as you correctly pointed out in your speech, is on a secular upward trend), supply by other players (think Latin American and Middle East supply problems). Russia is one of the global energy suppliers and certainly cannot by itself control world energy prices. Surely you must know this?



You might read the section of my book about Russia’s reported figures – especially the trade figures. Or get some one to read it to you and explain it to you. I know you said you have driven across Russia from the Pacific to Europe, but I’d like to know your route and which border crossings you used and who you found out there counting all this stuff.

[3] You really should have kept your mouth shut, but since you opened it: What balderdash. Now we know you have no understanding of markets in addition to being unable to read or comprehend. The Russian “market” is tiny and is insignificant compared to GNP so it is meaningless. Even your article points out that the few big hydrocarbon companies account for 70% of the stock market. [a] The price of oil more than doubled in the period the article discusses and [b] those stocks went up because of that and because of the manipulation by the oligarchs. Perhaps you did not notice your article mentioned the “murky” dealings in Russia?
I hardly consider 2 mutual funds and 4 or 5 manipulated oil stocks “as pretty convincing signs of investor confidence”.

If the stock
and bond market three year rally is not sufficient evidence for you, what about the fact that scores of major Western companies made significant capital commitments to Russia in the past few years? Here is just a sample of recent investments:

Pepsi $1 bn

Coca Cola $750 mln

Metro (Germany) €1 bn

United Technologies Corp. $400 mln

Mars LLC $500 mln

Procter & Gamble $150 mln

Boeing $1.3 bn

ExxonMobil $1.4 bn

BP $3 bn


If this is not a reliable sign of investor confidence, I don’t know what is. But you probably think these companies are lying, too? Or are they also being manipulated by evil oligarchs?



But if you really believe all this codswallop, why are you in business school? Why aren’t you there making your fortune?

Let me know if you desire to see my bank statements and resume, I’ll email them to you. I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised, maybe even compare them to yours when you were my tender age, for a real awakening. Maybe we can do the same when I am your age now, and we can revisit this cute discussion.

Rest assured, I certainly plan on continuing my career in Russia because I love the place, I am good at what I do and I will have a positive impact on the country. Surely, there are challenges and problems (name a place in the world that does not have a set of problems to deal with) but the opportunities are amazing. I find it extremely satisfying to be able to effect real change in the largest country in the world.



I presume you are long the Russian stock market? That’s correct.

For what it is worth, I was short the ruble and the Russian market in the summer of 1998 and back in the earlier bubble in the mid 1990s when Russia and its bureaucrats were going on and on with the same absurdity. Go back and look up what happened both times. Or perhaps you were long then too and got wiped out which is why you had to go to b school.

[4] “Overall state of the economy”: Now we are getting really embarrassed for you! The World Bank also praised Russia in 1998 just before the last collapse and in the mid 1990s just in time for that collapse. They also wrote in rapturous terms about all the Asia Tigers in mid 1997 just in time for the Asian Crisis [I was short Hong Kong back then too right into the World Bank’s rapture.] And the World Bank could not give Argentina enough money in the summer and fall of 2001 because of “its progress” when I was getting all my money out. [All this is very much on the public record so you do not need to fret about my image.]

While one may or may not agree with the World Bank’s adjectives and characterizations, there are objective facts and figures that speak for themselves. Do you think that 21% real GDP growth is a sign of total collapse of the economy or do you think that the government and international finance organizations are lying about the figures?



Need I go on? No one has ever stayed solvent much less made money listening to the World Bank [except business school professors who “consult” for them]. Oh dear, you get your information from the Russian government and the World Bank!? Are you mad? I know you say you have driven across Russia, but who do you really think is out there in those 11 time zones and tens of thousands on kilometers of Russia collecting all this “reliable data”?

And thanks for your advice about my analysis, facts and my “public image”. If you had done your homework, you’d know the public was and is extremely aware that I had shorted the ruble in 1998 and back in the mid 1990s [when I guess you were long]. It was the same kind if misinformation back then too that gullible souls like you swallowed.

Every “babushka” shorted ruble during that time period; it was a highly inflationary currency.

And the public is extremely aware of my record of investing in many markets all over the world for many years. You might read John Train’s Money Masters of Our Time or one of several other books. I do not worry about it, but you should worry about yours.

But as for public image and inaccurate statements, you have demonstrated quite publicly and vocally that you can neither read nor comprehend what you read nor can you analyze anything in front of you and that you fall for anything someone tells you and that you have absolutely no knowledge of even recent Russian history. I was terribly embarrassed for you when you stood there babbling on in front of the others about the strong ruble – a currency which has been nothing but a catastrophe for a decade [despite your painfully absurd statements], but now you have shouted your hopelessness from the roof tops for all to see.

I hope your classmates will pull you aside and pass on this word of advice: It is better to remain silent and have people wonder if you are an idiot rather than to open your mouth and prove to everyone in sight that you are an idiot beyond all doubt. And one should never, ever go shouting from the rooftops when one is a total idiot because then the entire school knows it.

I will leave it up to my classmates to make characterizations in this case. Again, I will not dignify your insulting comments with a response. If you are interested in what impression your email made on my classmates, please read this sample email - one of many similar emails I received today:

  “Dmitry, I was shocked by the letter that Jim wrote you. I am sorry that you had to read that. It was totally ridiculous. I thought you wrote him a respectful and well argued letter and for some reason he decided to tear into you. I am not sure who is on the right side of the facts, but I do know that I talked to the top guy at Morgan Stanley Private Client last week and he said that Russia is one of their top picks going forward. All the best, John”(name is changed for privacy reasons)


Respectfully yours,

Dmitry Alimov, CFA MBA Class of 2004
Harvard | Business | School

dalimov@mba2004.hbs.edu
Ph 617.491.7332

Harvard Business Student and Former Soros Exec Square Off in Email Exchange

By Susan L. Barreto, Senior Reporter
Tuesday, October 14, 2003

BOSTON (HedgeWorld.com)—When Russia’s positive Moody’s rating granting investment grade status made headlines last week, one Harvard Business Student undoubtedly was smiling.

This is because for the last month Dmitry Alimov has been reeling from a series of email exchanges sparked by a speech given by world-renowned investor Jim Rogers that Mr. Alimov believes falsely cast a negative light on Russia’s economic prospects.

Although the student’s email was intended to open up a scholarly debate over the future of Russia’s economy, the response from Mr. Rogers was a litany of disparaging remarks questioning Mr. Alimov’s intelligence and wisdom in believing statistics provided by the Russian government, the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.

Unfortunately, the email also was forwarded to Mr. Alimov’s classmates, along with Mr. Rogers’ response.

Mr. Rogers wrote: “I was terribly embarrassed for you when you stood there babbling on and on in front of the others about the strong ruble—a currency which has been nothing but a catastrophe for a decade (despite your painfully absurd statements), but now you have shouted your hopelessness from the roof tops for all to see.”

Respected as an authority on international investing, Mr. Rogers has written books on his travels around the world but is known mainly for co-founding the Quantum fund with George Soros in the 1970s Previous HedgeWorld Story.

Mr. Rogers, who has been hailed by Time Magazine as the Indiana Jones of finance, continues to travel and was on his way to Europe and unavailable for an interview via email or over the phone for this story. Mr. Rogers also holds a number of speaking engagements each year and is a regularly sought out for his market commentary.

Some of his most recent comments on Russia were unfounded, according to Mr. Alimov, who began questioning Mr. Rogers following the investment guru’s speech at Harvard last month.

“I have no idea why he would write something like that,” Mr. Alimov said. “In addition to getting the facts wrong, he lost any kind of decency in his language.”

Only Mr. Rogers knows what prompted him to tell the student, “It is better to remain silent and have people wonder if you are an idiot, rather than to open your mouth and prove to everyone you are an idiot beyond all doubt.”

In a follow-up email, Mr. Alimov apologized for upsetting Mr. Rogers and continued to rebut the touted investment expert’s remarks. He included charts on Russian immigration and figures on Russian oil output, in addition to citing a number of recent investments in Russia by large corporations such as Pepsi and Coca Cola.

In his response, Mr. Rogers was quick to point out that he shorted the Russian ruble in 1998 and was short the Russian market in the mid-1990s, when Russia and “its bureaucrats were going on and on with the same absurdity.” The Harvard Business School newspaper, The Harbus, also has gotten in the act, publishing a spoof email exchange between the Dalai Lama and Mr. Rogers. After a string of insults, including referring to the Dalai Lama as “cue ball,” Mr. Rogers emphatically tells the holy man that the lesson of showing compassion to one’s adversaries didn’t come from Buddha but was another lie from the Russian government, signing the letter, “Short Buddhism.”

All this attention has done little to diminish Mr. Alimov’s prospects for Russia and has made him a “virtual” celebrity. He’s received emails from all over, including one from an official at Renaissance Capital, one of Russia’s leading investment banks. It reads, “Do you realize that your struggle with Jim Rogers has made you famous? I must have received the e-mail from 20 different people.”

In another year or so, after finishing up his MBA, Mr. Alimov plans to return to Moscow. Before starting Harvard Business School, he was on the executive committee of Gazprom Media, which according to Mr. Alimov, is Russia’s largest media group with interests in television, radio, print and other media. He was responsible for two national television networks and several FM radio stations.

From New York Magazine

REPLY TO ALL, WITH HISTORY
Issue of 2003-09-29
Posted 2003-09-22
Jim Rogers, the so-called Indiana Jones of finance, is among those businessmen who, though not exactly hard-knocks graduates (Rogers attended Yale and Oxford), feel that the important lessons for achieving success are more apt to be gleaned from, say, a motorcycle ride across Siberia (Rogers holds two Guinness World Records for travelling around the globe) than from any formal schooling, least of all an M.B.A. program. Nonetheless, Rogers, like many moguls, is a happy participant in the B-school lecture circuit, on which C.E.O.s, studio executives, and authors get paid essentially to recount their own achievements, and perhaps to promote their latest projects—in Rogers’s case, a new book, “Adventure Capitalist.”

It was during one such appearance, at Harvard Business School the other day, that Rogers, wearing his usual bow tie and employing his Alabama drawl, first encountered Dmitry Alimov, and set off a chain of correspondence that future students would do well to examine. It is a case study in making a name for oneself, or making a fool of oneself—depending on your point of view. Dmitry, who is twenty-nine, is a native of Russia and a former employee of Gazprom, the Russian conglomerate. Like Rogers, he is an inveterate international traveller; unlike Rogers, he dresses the part of a post-Soviet European (white jeans, big collars, “Armani-type stuff”), and has chosen to enroll in business school. (He’s HBS ’04.) Dmitry is also the type of business student who raises his hand a lot, as he did when Rogers hammered on one of his favorite themes—that Russia, though full of adventure, is devoid of real capital (“It’s a disaster spiralling downward into a catastrophe”), and unworthy of investment.

Dmitry stood and aired his disagreements. Rogers more or less dismissed them. So that night, Dmitry wrote Rogers an e-mail. “I am the ‘lad’ who disputed your factual claims with regard to Russia today,” it began. He identified three specific allegations that Rogers had made: people are leaving Russia (“wrong”); Russia’s oil production is declining, and oil companies are not reinvesting (“wrong and wrong”); investors are abandoning Russia (“wrong again”). “Many people, including future leaders at Harvard Business School, listen to you,” he concluded. “It would be very unfortunate if they were misled by your inaccurate statements. Finally, if nothing else, it is not good for your own public image.” He added a postscript: “I took the liberty of sending a copy of this e-mail to my fellow students so that we can set the record straight.”

Round two came the following morning, in an e-mail reply from Rogers: “I rarely suffer fools gladly, and even more rarely bother with chauvinistic know-nothings, but since you sent this ludicrous canard . . .” Dmitry was gullible, Rogers said, for believing in data provided by the Russian government and the World Bank, among other things. “If you really believe all this codswallop, why are you in business school?” Rogers wrote. “Why aren’t you there making your fortune?” He continued, “I was terribly embarrassed for you when you stood there babbling on in front of the others about the strong ruble . . . , but now you have shouted your hopelessness from the rooftops for all to see.” Rogers, not to be outshouted, copied Dmitry’s classmates on the response.

Round three, later that night. “I see that you prefer the language of personal insults instead of informed polite discussion,” Dmitry, now a minor celebrity on the south bank of the Charles, replied (again to all). This time, he affixed evidence supplied by the U.S. government as well. “Let me know if you desire to see my bank statements and resume. . . . I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised, maybe even compare them to yours when you were my tender age, for a real awakening.”

Within days, the complete works of Rogers-Alimov, running to a few thousand words, had become one of those e-mails forwarded with great alacrity and mirth among Wall Street firms, British parliamentary committees, and salesmen in Korea. Typical reactions could be broken down into four categories: those from people who have always suspected that business school is a sham (“Jim Rogers kicking some B-school ass”); from the usual array of Harvard-haters; from certain fellow M.B.A. aspirants (to Dmitry: “Keep up the good work, and don’t let him get to you. You are representing us well”); and—case students, take note—from employers who have been moved to offer Dmitry a job (“If you would ever consider working for an investment bank . . . ”).

Round four has yet to be fought, although by late last week a side skirmish had broken out—copied to everyone, of course—between Rogers and Boris Jurash, an employee in the British Department of Constitutional Affairs (Boris: “I just like winding up smug-heads like yourself.” Rogers: “It is clear English is not a language in which you are proficient.” Boris: “Don’t be a twit, and stop clogging the Net”). Rogers seems to have lost interest in debating Dmitry, meanwhile, as he travels to promote his book. “I don’t know why I even bothered to answer that guy in the first place,” he said, over the phone. “Whether oil production is up five or six per cent is pretty meaningless in the context of this discussion, which was, and is, that Russia’s a hopeless place to invest.”

“My take on this is that Rogers can’t respond based on facts, because he knows his facts are wrong,” Dmitry said. “My best guess is he probably never had the chance to go to business school, and he probably had this feeling of being a little bit inadequate about that.”

“Inadequate,” in Rogers’s view, of course, is a term that might better be applied to Dmitry. “All over the world people are saying, ‘What’s wrong with this guy?’” Rogers said. “From the responses I’ve got, this makes him look like a fool.”


 

.

"Cauliflower is nothing but Cabbage with a College Education.
- The Tragedy of Pudd'nhead Wilson and the Comedy of the Extraordinary Twins

Successful investing is anticipating the anticipations of others.
JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES